Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.1 weeks
4.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Rejected
2016
Motivation: The reviewers gave very sound and compelling reasons for rejecting the paper. It helped us improve the content, and we eventually got it accepted in a good venue.