Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.9 weeks
25.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2025
10.0 weeks
29.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2024
Motivation:
The review process was very fast, but the reviews were also very detailed and constructive. They significantly improved our paper.
14.7 weeks
46.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2020
Motivation:
I fully respect the editor's decision to reject the paper, but even if it had been accepted, this is still my worst publishing experience ever because:
1. The reviewing process was outrageously long, and the editor was generally irresponsive to inquiries.
2. One reviewer suggested adding some marginally relevant references, which felt fishy to me.
1. The reviewing process was outrageously long, and the editor was generally irresponsive to inquiries.
2. One reviewer suggested adding some marginally relevant references, which felt fishy to me.