Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.6 weeks
5.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
3
Rejected
2023
Motivation: The review process was fast, but the reviewers did not seem to have the appropriate domain expertise. The final decision was based on ratings given by the reviewers that are not visible to us.
13.0 weeks
17.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
1
1
Rejected
2018
Motivation: The manuscript was initially deemed acceptable with minor revision, receiving very positive reviews. After the revision was submitted, one of the reviewers was changed. He outright rejected the paper, not understanding the concept and the technique presented. He did not seem to be familiar with the field and the problem the paper was addressing. He was trying to understand the paper with respect to his domain of knowledge and thus could not understand the concepts and contributions.