Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
28.4 weeks
28.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2025
Motivation:
Overall, the experience was a slightly negative one. Mainly because it took way too long to get a review back.
It feels as I got the decision right after I contacted the journal to ask about delays. 2/3 accepted, but 1/3 rejected and the editor sided with this reviewer. The accept (with minor revisions) comments were OK, not too much in depth. The one that rejected gave longer motivation and more detailed comments, but felt too strongly about a few aspects.
Nevertheless, the paper was improved after the comments and was resubmited to another journal.
It feels as I got the decision right after I contacted the journal to ask about delays. 2/3 accepted, but 1/3 rejected and the editor sided with this reviewer. The accept (with minor revisions) comments were OK, not too much in depth. The one that rejected gave longer motivation and more detailed comments, but felt too strongly about a few aspects.
Nevertheless, the paper was improved after the comments and was resubmited to another journal.
Immediately accepted after 30.9 weeks
Accepted (im.)
2013
Motivation:
The review process of this journal is quiet fast.