Reviews for "IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation | 5.1 weeks |
5.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
2 (moderate) |
Rejected |
Motivation: Specific reason should have been provided by the Editor for rejection. Reviewers had mentioned points which could have been modified as required. | |||||||
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation | 17.0 weeks |
17.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 2 (moderate) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: Reviews were short and too general. Reviewer 2 basically suggests we read and cite two papers that were not relevant to our work. | |||||||
IEEE Transactions on Evolutionary Computation | 13.0 weeks |
13.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
Motivation: The process was overall ok. My main issue is that we submitted the paper to a special issue, but it was considered "off topic" and then sent to the regular track. It took 3 months to receive the reply, which is more or less the average in my field. |