Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.1 weeks
5.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
2
Rejected
2022
Motivation: Specific reason should have been provided by the Editor for rejection. Reviewers had mentioned points which could have been modified as required.
17.0 weeks
17.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
3
Rejected
2021
Motivation: Reviews were short and too general. Reviewer 2 basically suggests we read and cite two papers that were not relevant to our work.
13.0 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
3
Rejected
2013
Motivation: The process was overall ok. My main issue is that we submitted the paper to a special issue, but it was considered "off topic" and then sent to the regular track. It took 3 months to receive the reply, which is more or less the average in my field.