Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
15.7 weeks
15.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2022
Motivation:
They only sent out the manuscript to "one" reviewer. The reviewer misinterpreted major parts of our work. They made false assumptions on our problem formulation even when we had explicitly stated all the details both in text and in figures. The fact that they made the decision on just one review is extremely unprofessional.
14.6 weeks
14.6 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
2 reviewers: Major Revision
1 reviewer: Reject & Resubmit
1 reviewer: Reject
editor outcome: reject since he/she thought that it needs more time than a normal time for major revision.
1 reviewer: Reject & Resubmit
1 reviewer: Reject
editor outcome: reject since he/she thought that it needs more time than a normal time for major revision.
n/a
n/a
91 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation:
The editor disappointingly did not understand the work, and insulted us by a comment that he believes the paper is generated by a computer! This work was reviewed internally at our institution by four professors who were all co-authors; all English native speakers! We submitted a complain to the editor in chief and we did not receive ANY sort of response! Very bad experience with this journal, its editor, and editor in chief. Stay away from this journal.