Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
73.7 weeks
73.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Rejected
2024
Motivation: The reviewers highlighted important problems in the modeling, which we worked on and improved for our next submission.
35.4 weeks
35.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
1
Drawn back
2023
Motivation: My co-authors and I felt that for the amount of time it took, the reviews were too simplistic. Furthermore, there was no response from the editor when we sent reminders at the 4-month and 5-month mark. At the 8-month mark, we finally were forced to email the editor-in-chief to finally get the reject-and-resubmit option.
32.7 weeks
48.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2021
Motivation: Overall, the reviewers commented on the work in detail, and the editor's summary was also very helpful in improving the paper. However, one of the reviewers kept on insisting on adding very tangential papers in the related works section written by the same author. I believe this is not good practice among the reviewers of a journal widely recognized as the best in the field of computer networks.