Reviews for "IEEE Access"

Journal title	Average duration			Review reports (1^st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page)	1^st rev. rnd	Tot. handling	Im. rejection	Number	Quality	Overall rating	Outcome
IEEE Access	3.0 weeks	7.7 weeks	n/a	3	4 (very good)	4 (very good)	Accepted
IEEE Access	6.0 weeks	9.9 weeks	n/a	3	2 (moderate)	2 (moderate)	Accepted
IEEE Access	Motivation: My paper was first rejected to address the reviewers concerns. The reviews were not of very good quality and they asked me to add their own citations. After I resubmitted, the chief editor made a mistake and rejected my paper. I had then to contact him to reverse his decision, and after a while my paper was accepted.
IEEE Access	8.6 weeks	8.6 weeks	n/a	2	2 (moderate)	2 (moderate)	Rejected
IEEE Access	Motivation: The reviewers found my paper not interesting. However, they didn't prove with references that it was not original compared to other works.
IEEE Access	5.7 weeks	5.7 weeks	n/a	2	3 (good)	1 (bad)	Rejected
IEEE Access	Motivation: The journal has a binary peer-review. I received two reviews that were different. The first reviewer accepted the paper and the second one rejected. The editor rejected the paper, without giving the opportunity of a re-submission, which I didn't understand due to the comments of the first reviewer. The main reason was that is was the sequence of another paper that was not already published.