Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
5 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
Motivation:
Was told that the paper was not novel enough for the journal.
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2014
4.1 weeks
4.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
Thorough reviews from knowledgeable reviewers; Quick decisions by editor; No delays at any point in process. Also very quick from acceptance to proofs & online publication.
13.4 weeks
20.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
Editor had a really good read of the paper.
She really persisted with it and resulted in a better paper.
She really persisted with it and resulted in a better paper.