Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
60 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
22.1 weeks
22.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
4
Accepted
2016
Motivation: I thought that the overall review process was enjoyable. The reviewers provided valuable comments to the manuscript, and I think their responses improved the overall quality of the paper. The main criticism is the relatively long delay between submitting the manuscript and getting reviewer comments back - nearly 5 months time in between. Once the reviews came back, the rest of the process moved quite quickly.