Reviews for "Hydrological Processes"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Hydrological Processes | n/a | n/a | 30.4 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
| Motivation: It took the editor about a month to say that this manuscript is not adequately interesting for HYP. | |||||||
| Hydrological Processes | 7.4 weeks |
16.3 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
| Motivation: I understand where one of the reviewers was coming from (the one who was most dissatisfied with our revisions) but I also felt that we'd done a good job explaining in our revision why we disagreed with the fundamental critique and request for eliminating a portion of our paper. | |||||||