Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.3 weeks
5.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2025
Motivation:
It took about a month for the journal to send it for peer review. On the positive side, they send you a personalised link where you can see how many reviewers accepted and how many have already sent their decision.
Regarding the quality of the comments, they were generally good and well-founded. However, I am somewhat concerned that one of the reviewers suggested adding some references that many had in common with the same author, which indicates certain bad practices. Although, as the manuscript was rejected, I cannot say this with certainty.
Regarding the quality of the comments, they were generally good and well-founded. However, I am somewhat concerned that one of the reviewers suggested adding some references that many had in common with the same author, which indicates certain bad practices. Although, as the manuscript was rejected, I cannot say this with certainty.