Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
2.6 weeks
8.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
2.3 weeks
2.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017
Motivation:
The reviewers were clearly experts in the field and identified a methodological problem we had overlooked. This clearly improved the paper.
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
Motivation:
The process was very fast, the Editor liked the topic of our paper but it did not exactly fit in the scope of the journal.
6.4 weeks
6.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
Motivation:
Reasonable time for turnaround, motives for rejection are clear.