Reviews for "Historical Studies in the Natural Sciences"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
8.9
weeks
10.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2016
Motivation: The reviews were good, but it was the work of the very knowledgeable and capable editorial board that really helped improving this manuscript during the review process. The editors managed to keep the balance between the opinions of the reviewers and our intentions as authors, and worked actively to make the manuscript fit for publication.
32.4
weeks
45.9
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2014
Motivation: Rigorous and very good review process that improved the quality of the manuscript considerably.