Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.9 weeks
10.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
The reviews were good, but it was the work of the very knowledgeable and capable editorial board that really helped improving this manuscript during the review process. The editors managed to keep the balance between the opinions of the reviewers and our intentions as authors, and worked actively to make the manuscript fit for publication.
32.4 weeks
45.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
Rigorous and very good review process that improved the quality of the manuscript considerably.