Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
10.1 weeks
10.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
In the first round we had enthusiastic comments from 2 reviewers and suggestions for basic minor revisions. Editor encouraged revisions ( "we see real strengths in your manuscript") and after revisions both the two reviewers accepted the paper. However the editor decided to not publish the paper, denied to send us the referee reports for the revised manuscript ("The reviewers recommended acceptance of your resubmitted manuscript" is the only thing I was allowed to know). Adduced reasons were, in my opinion, insignificant and surely tardive!
Basically I, my co-author and the two reviewers wasted our time!!! .
Basically I, my co-author and the two reviewers wasted our time!!! .
27.7 weeks
41.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2018
41.0 weeks
54.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2014
Motivation:
Despite the quality of the reviews, it took extremely long to get even a first decision.
30.4 weeks
42.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2012
n/a
n/a
28 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013