Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
10.0 weeks
10.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Rejected
2016
Motivation: Great comments from only one reviewer
Too much time for taken for all process
6.4 weeks
6.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
2
3
Rejected
2015
Motivation: Three reviewers judged very differently about the manuscript, one suggested minor changes and made valueable comments, one was intermediate, suggested major revisions, but from the report it appears that this was not a specialist in the field, the third referee recommended rejection, although there was only one major point that was criticized. We wrote a rebuttal to the points raised by the referees and asked for a resubmission, which was allowed, although the initial rejection. We then re-worked the manuscript including many new analyses.
6.9 weeks
6.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
3
Rejected
2015