Reviews for "Health and Place"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Health and Place | 17.4 weeks |
17.4 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 1 (bad) |
1 (bad) |
Rejected |
Health and Place | n/a | n/a | 3.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: Fast first decision. | |||||||
Health and Place | 5.0 weeks |
21.4 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Very helpful feedback on how to improve the paper. | |||||||
Health and Place | n/a | n/a | 9.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Health and Place | 14.4 weeks |
18.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The review process was factual, thorough and speedy. I was highly satisfied with both communication with editor and commentaries addressed by reviewers. | |||||||
Health and Place | 10.1 weeks |
17.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: My manuscript was reviewed with great care, the reviewers' comments helped to sharpen my messages and absolutely improved it's quality. Correspondence with the journal was easy, very accessible. | |||||||
Health and Place | n/a | n/a | 10.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |