Reviews for "Growth and Change"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a n/a 31.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.) 2021
Motivation: The journal does not have a fair peer-review process in my opinion. The reasons for rejection are not motivated.
8.7
weeks
9.7
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2019
Motivation: Fairly quick review rounds with helpful and constructive reviews which contributed to improving my article. I was overall very satisfied with the process.
12.4
weeks
29.6
weeks
n/a 4 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2018
Motivation: Very helpful comments by reviewers who are experts in their fields. Short time for each round.