Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.9 weeks
5.9 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Rejected
2017
Motivation: Quick but rigor process. Really great reviewer with lots of useful and positive (also sometimes over-critical) remarks. Fast process. Minor remark: Decision to send paper out to external review was not shared with us.