Reviews for "Global Ecology and Biogeography"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Global Ecology and Biogeography 13.7
weeks
13.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Rejected
Motivation: The reviewers and editors highlighted several problems which we had not taken into account but were very valid, which hopefully when addressed will result in an improved manuscript.
Global Ecology and Biogeography 0.6
weeks
0.6
weeks
n/a 3 2
(moderate)
3
(good)
Rejected
Motivation: Of course, I recommend this journal if we can publish the paper in it, but I am not very satisfied with the response of the associate editor and two reviewers, because they all put forward the comments not really related to the species distribution models, which is the main approach of our paper. They gave me the feeling that all reviewers are not working on species distribution models, becasue their critics are about the data we used and the resolution we determine. But the time of the process seems ok that we can get the decision quickly.
Global Ecology and Biogeography n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Manuscript was not considered fit for the journal.
Global Ecology and Biogeography n/a n/a 5.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Editor responded to my questions on the reason for rejection without review
Global Ecology and Biogeography n/a n/a 3.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Global Ecology and Biogeography 7.6
weeks
9.1
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted