Reviews for "Global and Planetary Change"

Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
n/a 1 4
(very good)
(very good)
Accepted 2015
Motivation: I found the journal handled my manuscript in a fair way. The review process did not take too ling. The manuscript was sent to only one reviewer, but he gave very reasonable and competent comments that improved it significantly. The editor just mediated the communication between the authors and the reviewer, in a very formal but efficient way.
I am happy and I will consider this journal for further publications.