Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.4 weeks
8.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
The reviewers were expert in the field. The journal office was helpful and responsive.
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2022
Motivation:
Fast rejection with few / no reasons
4.9 weeks
4.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2017
Motivation:
Reviewer selection was poor, reviews were unconstructive and low quality, editorial input was minimal and defered to poor quality reviews.