Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
8.7 weeks
18.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2024
Motivation:
The submission process is very smooth, however, the website indicates that review time averages ~1 month, which signficantly shorter than we experienced, especially after revision. It didn't appear that reviewers with the expertise we were targeting were selected based on the questions and misinterpretations that were made.
11.0 weeks
17.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2024
Motivation:
We got 3 reviewers, the reports were relatively easy and the handling was really smooth.
Just the editorial modifications (formatting, gene names, etc) was a bit a pain, but nothing impossible.
Just the editorial modifications (formatting, gene names, etc) was a bit a pain, but nothing impossible.
n/a
n/a
37 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2021
13.4 weeks
16.7 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2021
Motivation:
The first round of review was too slow.
I'll never submit my manuscript to this journal.
I'll never submit my manuscript to this journal.
16.3 weeks
16.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
14 weeks after submission I sent an email to the editor inquiring on the unusual length of the review. Within one hour I received a rejection email. Who knows how long had the editor sat on our reviews, and how they made a haste decision immediately after receiving my message. This did not feel at all like a professional and thorough evaluation of the reviewers' comments, which were easily addressable. Ultimately the paper was published in a journal of higher impact and has been cited >100 times.
16.9 weeks
19.8 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
The initial review time was far longer than what is reported as their average turn-around time on their website. The handling editor did, however, reach out to notify us of the prolonged wait time and made efforts to speed the remainder of the review process. The reviewers comments were helpful and seemed to be from peers who were indeed experts in the field-of-interest.
16.7 weeks
25.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
We submitted our manuscript to Genome Research via BioRxiv and it was sent to review about a week later. We didn't get our reviewer's reports back until nearly 4 months of time had passed! The reviewers were all very pleased with the paper and only requested some additional bioinformatics analysis and clarifications. We turned around our revised paper in a few weeks and it still took them another two months to accept the paper. Really pleased with the outcome, but with the lengthy review process, I'd be reluctant to submit to Genome Research in the future.
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
n/a
n/a
14 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2012