Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
10.3 weeks
10.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
3
Rejected
10.3 weeks
10.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
2
Rejected
n/a
n/a
5 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
n/a
n/a
10 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Rejected because it did not fit the scope of the journal.
3.7 weeks
4.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: expeditious reviews with reasonable requests
n/a
n/a
11 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation: The journal is on average very good (the statistical genetics section is of lower quality). The manuscript rejection because of being "out of scope" is relatively fast and you do not lose too much time waiting for the outcome.
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
Motivation: Wasn't broadly interesting enough.
4.3 weeks
8.8 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
Motivation: The editorial process was fair and reflected referee's comments