Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.1 weeks
12.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2014
Motivation:
Good analysis, but limited understanding of the relation with the existing literature
13.7 weeks
13.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2016
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2013
Motivation:
The positive point is the short term of the review process.
Negative point: a 2 lines review mostly suggesting another less ranked journal.
Negative point: a 2 lines review mostly suggesting another less ranked journal.