Reviews for "Gait and Posture"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Gait and Posture 9.9
weeks
14.2
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Valuable information given by the reviewers and fair reviewing process.
Gait and Posture 16.0
weeks
22.0
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
3
(good)
Drawn back
Gait and Posture 21.9
weeks
21.9
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
1
(bad)
Rejected
Motivation: Extremely long review process ( 5 months). Associate editor couldn't find reviewers and in the end got only two instead of three. Rejection decision was based on concerns expressed by the two reviewers that were clearly debatable and showed a one-sided theoretical bias. I would have like to have the chance to respond to the reviews. I didn't... I got the sense that the manuscript got the shaft by the associate editor as he/she didn't get involved and wanted this done with. Not impress by the review process.