Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
22.9 weeks
22.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
0
Rejected
2023
Motivation: Extremely poor handling of the manuscript by a guest editor. Worst experience ever when it comes to editorial handling of a manuscript. 1 reviewer proposed rejection, which can happen and is not such a problem, however the handling of the editor was horrible. Furthermore second reviewer requested minor revisions which makes it rather odd. Paper got stuck in the editorial proces for months after.
6.4 weeks
7.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2019
Motivation: Review reports were excellent and very constructive. Interactive review is a very good way to address reviewers's concerns. I highly recommend this journal to fellow scientists.
7.0 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2018
Motivation: The review process started 12 days after I submited.
4.3 weeks
8.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
4
4
Accepted
2014
5.0 weeks
7.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2015
Motivation: Frontiers provides authors chance to direct to interact with the reviewer, which is sometime quite useful.