Reviews for "Frontiers in Neuroinformatics"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 7.4
weeks
10.6
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: The editor was very responsive and he processed all necessary things in a due manner. One external reviewer provided very constructive and details comments. However, the other reviewer did not provide quality comments.
Frontiers in Neuroinformatics 5.4
weeks
10.0
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
3
(good)
Accepted
Motivation: All in all, the review process was fine. However, in my opinion, the quality of one reviewer's report was very low, and this reviewer was obviously not familiar with the research area. Furthermore, this reviewer then withdrew from the review process at a later stage (for no obvious/mentioned reason), which considerably delayed the review process, because then a new review round started from scratch with a new reviewer.