Reviews for "Frontiers in Microbiology"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome Year
Frontiers in Microbiology 8.0
weeks
8.0
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected 2018
Motivation: A review time of eight weeks is a bit long for a journal that boasts about speed. The reviews were fair, but a bit passive-aggressive.
Frontiers in Microbiology 4.6
weeks
4.6
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2019
Frontiers in Microbiology 4.1
weeks
8.4
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: The Frontiers in Microbiology interactive review system is quite good. It allows exchanges between authors, editor and reviewers in a very dynamic way. The reviewer reports were also quite good and really helped improvng the manuscript. Manuscript handling time was also quite fast.
Frontiers in Microbiology 6.4
weeks
10.7
weeks
n/a 2 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2018
Frontiers in Microbiology 6.3
weeks
14.6
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
2
(moderate)
Accepted 2018
Frontiers in Microbiology 4.3
weeks
5.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
Motivation: The journal process is so fast, transparent and journal publishes high-quality papers. i have read so many papers of this journals. Normally journal took two weeks as review process but in my case, the English language was not appropriate for a reviewer, so we got the little delay in revision but after English editing, we got acceptance within 1 month. we can see the review progress in real time. I will recommend this journal for all authors.
Frontiers in Microbiology 3.4
weeks
6.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2018
Frontiers in Microbiology 2.9
weeks
4.3
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2017
Frontiers in Microbiology 9.3
weeks
11.7
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted 2016
Frontiers in Microbiology 4.0
weeks
6.4
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
5
(excellent)
Accepted 2016