Reviews for "Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution | 21.1 weeks |
26.1 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 3 (good) |
0 (very bad) |
Rejected |
Motivation: Editors should understand their responsibility to go through the reviewer comments and how these are addressed by authors. Proper reasons for rejection should be given e.g. specific comments that remain unaddressed. |
|||||||
Frontiers in Ecology and Evolution | 24.9 weeks |
29.0 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
3 (good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Some problem with review process. But overall rating is quite good. |