Reviews for "Foundations of Computational Mathematics"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Foundations of Computational Mathematics 67.0
n/a 2 2
Motivation: It took FoCM more than a year from the date of submission until we received a response from the editor. One reviewer was clearly an expert and wrote a positive review, recommending only smaller changes. The other reviewer, who was very clearly not an expert on the topic and misunderstood several of our results, wrote a negative report. The editor chose to listen to the non-expert.