Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
24.4 weeks
26.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
4
Accepted
2022
Motivation: Long duration of initial round of review was due to circumstances outside the journal's control. Editors and journal staff were communicative through all aspects. One of the better experiences I've had with receiving critical comments that were helpful without being demeaning.
6.0 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2015
Motivation: Extremely fast and comprehensive review.There was a problem with the second reviewer and the Editor-in-Chief called time on this and have carried this out himself as Reviewer #2.