Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
n/a
n/a
200 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation:
The manuscript was rejected by the Editorial Board after almost 7 months. During this period I kindly asked to have some communication by the Editor but I never had any reply. According to the Journal web site, the manuscript was under review, but the communication by the Editor in Chief simply said that “the Editorial Board has evaluated the manuscript unacceptable for publication in our journal”. No additional comment or reason was provided or available on the website.
n/a
n/a
219 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2015
Motivation:
Though I hope this is not a common practice, I think nobody should experience such an unbelievable ignorance of managing editor to the mails asking about what's going on with the paper (mails sent 4 times after 6 months of silence) which ended with a short justification of rejection.