Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.4 weeks
7.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2020
Motivation: Report of the first reviewer was not very constructive, but the second reviewer and the editor were.
3.6 weeks
3.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
2
3
Rejected
2016
5.0 weeks
5.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2015
Motivation: Reviewers comments were clear and easy-to-follow. They improved the quality of the work and not just the way it was presented.
8.3 weeks
8.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2014
Motivation: Review process on For Ecol Manage is generally fast. The first Editor assessment is very fast, less than a week. You are informed about the review steps, and have the feeling that editorial work is really fast.
n/a
n/a
4 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2012