Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
12.6 weeks
13.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2023
Motivation:
The review process was extremely slow and lacking in information. It was only after almost 3 months when I sent an email to the editor asking about the status of the article that I received the reviewer's comments and the process continued. However, after the first revision, the process until the publication of the first version online was very fast and efficient.
n/a
n/a
8 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation:
Our paper was desk-rejected. No specific reasons were given for the decision, except that the editor felt it was not a good fit for the journal. At least they didn't take long.
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2018
28.2 weeks
39.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2013