Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
5.0 weeks
5.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2016
Motivation: Took less than two months to see the manuscript accepted. The reviews were not really helpful, but the reviewers were not aggressive, so in general the experience was smooth. One of the reviewers has insistently forced us to remove some hypothesis from the manuscript. This is not the reviewer's job, strictly speaking. Overall, the editor just proxied reviewers reports to the authors. Not a super pleasant experience, but not a headache as well.