Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.4 weeks
7.4 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2018
Motivation:
The review process was fairly fast, but still the editor apologized for "delay in review" (so usually the review process may be even faster). The chief editor saied he/she could not obtain the second review, so he/she worked as the second referee. The review was strict but reasonable and helpful.
6.0 weeks
11.4 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2017
5.7 weeks
5.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Rejected
2017