Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.9 weeks
12.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
3
Accepted
2023
Motivation: Overall, this review process was good, but it was slow. Reviewers had minor comments, but it took an incredibly long time to get feedback on resubmission.
8.1 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
1
2
Accepted
2019
Motivation: One peer review of little substance. Easy revision. Slow review process. Online system has poor tracking/status features compared w other journals. Expensive to submit and publish here.
4.3 weeks
6.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
5
Accepted
2018
Motivation: Very efficient.
8.7 weeks
13.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2018
5.1 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2017
Motivation: Reveiw process was almost good but distribution for referees were dilayed due to lack of reviewers about rare disease.
Immediately accepted after 8.7 weeks
Accepted (im.)
2015
4.0 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
3
3
Rejected
2015