Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
8.9 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
The initial review took around 2 months, allowed 2 months for revision and resubmittion.
4.9 weeks
12.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
Overall, this review process was good, but it was slow. Reviewers had minor comments, but it took an incredibly long time to get feedback on resubmission.
8.1 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
One peer review of little substance. Easy revision. Slow review process. Online system has poor tracking/status features compared w other journals. Expensive to submit and publish here.
4.3 weeks
6.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
Very efficient.
8.7 weeks
13.3 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
5.1 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
Motivation:
Reveiw process was almost good but distribution for referees were dilayed due to lack of reviewers about rare disease.
Immediately accepted after 8.7 weeks
Accepted (im.)
4.0 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Rejected