Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
31.0 weeks
31.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3.0 / 5.0
2.0 / 5.0
Rejected
Motivation:
The paper was rejected due to lack of novelty. After a long period under review, the corrisponding author decided to e-mail the editor for news about the manuscript state, and recevied no answer. They oly received answer after directly contacting Elsevier.
9.6 weeks
19.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3.0 / 5.0
4.0 / 5.0
Accepted