Reviews for "Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 19.1
weeks
25.6
weeks
n/a 2 5
(excellent)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: The review process was overall very good. Reviewers' comments were very insightful and helped to significantly improve the final version of the article. However, I received the reviews only after more than 4 months.
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 11.7
weeks
15.3
weeks
n/a 2 4
(very good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Constructive remarks from the reviewers. Serious handle by the editor.
However, the editing process did not respect the mathematics typo I used and degrade it.
Experimental Thermal and Fluid Science 4.6
weeks
10.1
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
4
(very good)
Accepted
Motivation: Constructive remarks from the reviewers. Editor efficient and professional.