Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
4.3 weeks
6.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2025
Motivation:
Experimental Neurology is a very high quality standard journal, manuscript is accepted if experimental comments are addressed. Peer review and quality for my manuscript was excellent and swift. The editor was sharp at the same time did not delay the process. Overall a very high quality journal
11.1 weeks
11.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Rejected
2024
Motivation:
At first, it looked like the editor preferred our manuscript for publishing in a special issue due to its relevant topic. We waited for 2.5 months, but then the manuscript was rejected because the reviewers didn't like it. It was a hard time for us because we had been waiting for so long with so much hope.
4.9 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
Straightforward process, useful reviews and overall a painless process.