Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
3.3 weeks
6.6 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5.0 / 5.0
4.0 / 5.0
Accepted
Motivation:
The revised version should have been submitted within 90 days, but we asked for the extension of the dead line and they accepted the extension immediately.
2.7 weeks
3.0 weeks
n/a
1 reports
3.0 / 5.0
3.0 / 5.0
Accepted
Motivation:
In this specific occasion, reviewing process was very fast but a little bit less accurate than usual, according to my previous experience with the same journal. However, proof editing and all associated editorial services respected a high standard.
6.6 weeks
9.1 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5.0 / 5.0
4.0 / 5.0
Accepted