Reviews for "Experimental Astronomy"

Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
11.9 weeks
14.7 weeks
n/a
1 reports
5
4
Accepted
2011
Motivation: The reviewing time was perhaps longish, but the review was thorough, and improved the paper. Part of the reviewing time was during Christmas holidays, and I took as much time to implement the changes, so I think it is justified. Editorial changes were very straightforward to implement.