Reviews for "Evolution"
| Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| (click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
| Evolution | 14.0 weeks |
29.7 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 5 (excellent) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: The reviews were the best I've ever received. The associate editor was really helpful and acted as a third reviewer. On the other hand, it took a year to have the manuscript accepted, so it was a really long time. | |||||||
| Evolution | 6.0 weeks |
7.9 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 3 (good) |
3 (good) |
Rejected |
| Evolution | 6.6 weeks |
10.7 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
| Motivation: The reviewers and editors provided excelent input and drove me to get a more general and elegant result. | |||||||
@scirev