Reviews for "Eurosurveillance"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
Eurosurveillance 26.0
weeks
52.1
weeks
n/a 2 2
(moderate)
0
(very bad)
Rejected
Motivation: One of the reviewers enjoyed the paper and suggested publication. The second reviewer was obviously uncomfortable with statistics and did not understand the study design, however they never said to reject the paper. A different reviewer should have been chosen. It felt that the editor never read the paper and strongly guided by one reviewer and not the other.
Eurosurveillance n/a n/a 21.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)
Eurosurveillance n/a n/a 2.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)