Reviews for "European Union Politics"
Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.9 weeks
12.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2020
Motivation:
This was the best and most thorough review process I have experienced so far. I am thankful to the Editor and reviewers for their excellent comments.
10.8 weeks
23.9 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2016
Motivation:
Very tough comments from 4 reviewers.
The best experience I ever had with a journal's editorial staff!
Excellent final editing. They replicated all my analyses!
The best experience I ever had with a journal's editorial staff!
Excellent final editing. They replicated all my analyses!
2.9 weeks
8.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2013
n/a
n/a
2 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2013
Motivation:
The editor replied immediately and provided constructive feed-back for possible revisions.
10.4 weeks
18.1 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2015
Motivation:
Excellent experience. Reviews of high quality, very good correspondence with the editorial team.
7.0 weeks
25.0 weeks
n/a
4 reports
Accepted
2013
Motivation:
The editor is very involved in the review process. This was my second experience with EUP and although the review process is tough, it is also overall rather fair and the editor seems to be able to get reviewers who are both fast and efficient.
11.0 weeks
19.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2010