Reviews for "European Union Politics"
Journal title | Average duration | Review reports (1st review rnd.) |
|||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
(click to go to journal page) | 1st rev. rnd | Tot. handling | Im. rejection | Number | Quality | Overall rating | Outcome |
European Union Politics | 7.9 weeks |
12.6 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: This was the best and most thorough review process I have experienced so far. I am thankful to the Editor and reviewers for their excellent comments. | |||||||
European Union Politics | 10.8 weeks |
23.9 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Very tough comments from 4 reviewers. The best experience I ever had with a journal's editorial staff! Excellent final editing. They replicated all my analyses! |
|||||||
European Union Politics | 2.9 weeks |
8.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
European Union Politics | n/a | n/a | 2.0 days |
n/a | n/a | n/a | Rejected (im.) |
Motivation: The editor replied immediately and provided constructive feed-back for possible revisions. | |||||||
European Union Politics | 10.4 weeks |
18.1 weeks |
n/a | 3 | 5 (excellent) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |
Motivation: Excellent experience. Reviews of high quality, very good correspondence with the editorial team. | |||||||
European Union Politics | 7.0 weeks |
25.0 weeks |
n/a | 4 | 4 (very good) |
4 (very good) |
Accepted |
Motivation: The editor is very involved in the review process. This was my second experience with EUP and although the review process is tough, it is also overall rather fair and the editor seems to be able to get reviewers who are both fast and efficient. | |||||||
European Union Politics | 11.0 weeks |
19.0 weeks |
n/a | 2 | 4 (very good) |
5 (excellent) |
Accepted |