Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
11.7 weeks
19.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
Accepted
2023
11.1 weeks
20.4 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2019
Motivation:
The editors were quick in finding reviewers and making decisions. The quality of the reviewer reports was moderate.
26.3 weeks
35.3 weeks
n/a
1 reports
Accepted
2018
Motivation:
We had to wait six months to receive one (1) half-page review. Based on this, the editor rejected the manuscript, yet invited us to resubmit a revised version of the manuscript.
The one review gave us almost nothing to work with—only very vague suggestions to turn our manuscript (that was a bit too long for the journal's word limit when we submitted it) into what the reviewer called a "full blown article." We made a few cosmetic changes to the manuscript (changed the title as requested by the reviewer, moved some text around), waited three weeks, and resubmitted the manuscript.
After two more months of waiting, we received a decision that the manuscript was now accepted. It had been sent to one external reviewer who determined that the revisions we had made were satisfactory.
The one review gave us almost nothing to work with—only very vague suggestions to turn our manuscript (that was a bit too long for the journal's word limit when we submitted it) into what the reviewer called a "full blown article." We made a few cosmetic changes to the manuscript (changed the title as requested by the reviewer, moved some text around), waited three weeks, and resubmitted the manuscript.
After two more months of waiting, we received a decision that the manuscript was now accepted. It had been sent to one external reviewer who determined that the revisions we had made were satisfactory.
66.1 weeks
113.6 weeks
n/a
2 reports
Accepted
2017