Reviews for "European Review of Agricultural Economics"

Journal title Average duration Review reports
(1st review rnd.)
(click to go to journal page) 1st rev. rnd Tot. handling Im. rejection Number Quality Overall rating Outcome
European Review of Agricultural Economics 12.1
weeks
12.1
weeks
n/a 3 3
(good)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: We received three reviews. Generally, all comments helped us to either improve our technical procedure or showed us which parts need more explanation. However, extensive questions and doubts by one of the reviewers about very basic agronomic and econometric processes showed us that the journal required to frame the paper for a very general non-agricultural and non-economic audience.
European Review of Agricultural Economics 8.0
weeks
8.0
weeks
n/a 2 1
(bad)
2
(moderate)
Rejected
Motivation: Timely handling for an economics journal. Both reviewers were extremely negative about the paper and it seemed that neither the reviewers nor the editor fully read our work. Resulting, the reviews were uninformative, very short and of low quality. Unfortunately, the process did not help to improve our work.
European Review of Agricultural Economics 22.0
weeks
29.3
weeks
n/a 3 5
(excellent)
5
(excellent)
Accepted
Motivation: There was some slight delay in the first review round, only because one of the reviewers didn't submit the report. However, the review report I got was of great value to improve quality of the paper. The delay in publishing the paper after getting acceptance from the editor was bit disappointing (1 year), but possibly because many papers are in the queue.
European Review of Agricultural Economics n/a n/a 24.0
days
n/a n/a n/a Rejected (im.)