Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
7.4 weeks
7.4 weeks
n/a
4 reports
4
5
Rejected
2022
Motivation: We had four reviewers. All of them thought the article was interesting and methodologically good. Two reviewers did mild revisions, one was very thorough, and the last did not try understanding the manuscript. It was too molecular for the journal.
12.1 weeks
12.1 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Rejected
2020
Motivation: The turnaround was longer than expected, but the journal gave us a fair review and raised interesting points to improve.
n/a
n/a
1 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2020
Motivation: The paper was rejected with a comment from an editor, "There is no novelty".
6.6 weeks
6.6 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
3
Rejected
2019
Motivation: Good reviewing but took some time.