Dur. 1st rev. rnd
Tot. handling time
Imm. rejection time
Num. rev. reports
Report quality
Overall rating
Outcome
Year
13.1 weeks
25.3 weeks
n/a
3 reports
3
4
Accepted
2022
Motivation: Competent reviewers, a bit more guidance from the editor could have helped, but in the end we got the paper through...
8.0 weeks
12.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Accepted
2017
Motivation: Quick review process, overall constructive and positive feedback
n/a
n/a
3 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2017
6.1 weeks
11.0 weeks
n/a
3 reports
4
5
Accepted
2017
n/a
n/a
13 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation: Very ridiculous reason to reject the paper. The reason was that my paper was based on a single country. Basically EJPR just want cross-national studies which are more likely to be cited in the future. EJPR used to be about interesting research, now it's just citation-hunting and the journal is going downhill...
8.7 weeks
13.0 weeks
n/a
2 reports
5
5
Accepted
2016
Motivation: Response editor, but no editorial comments or suggestions in r&r letter.
8.7 weeks
8.7 weeks
n/a
2 reports
3
4
Rejected
2016
n/a
n/a
12 days
n/a
n/a
n/a
Rejected (im.)
2016
Motivation: Disappointing, but reasons clearly given.
8.0 weeks
11.9 weeks
n/a
2 reports
4
4
Accepted
2013
Motivation: strong reviewers; overall duration was fine; very quick to go online after acceptance